I don’t think “refusing” news sources is helpful. Even a bad newspaper gives some perspective on some topics that you won’t find elsewhere.
The whole idea of “news sources” is problematic. It assumes a certain 20th century model of learning about the world. If you want to get really informed about a topic it often necessary to read primary sources. I don’t get scientific news from mainstream media. I either read the papers, discussion on LW or blogs by scientists.
When I see a claim that I find interesting and where I don’t know it’s true I head over to skeptic.stackexchange and open a question. The website is no newspaper but it also serves the purpose of staying in contact with world events.
Advertising is just one biases among many. If I watch a news video at German public television that’s payed for by taxpayer money, the a German public television network pays a production company for that video. Some of those production companies also produce PR for paying customers.
A lot of articles in newspapers get these days written by freelance journalists who aren’t payed very well and can be hired for other tasks. So even if the newspaper wouldn’t make it’s money by serving corporate interest the individual journalist might still serve corporate interests.
Wikipedia illustrates that we are actually quite good at coordination. Much better than anyone would have expected 20 years ago. It just doesn’t like like we would have expected. Cultural development isn’t just more of the same.
If you make an utility calculation than the prime concern is about whether it makes sense to learn about a topic in the first place. If you do decide to inform yourself about a topic than you have to choose among the sources that are available. If you really care about an issue than it often makes sense to read multiple perspectives.
It quite easy to read government funded Al Jazeera, a commercial newspaper by a publically traded company that makes money via advertising and network driven community websites like Stackexchange or Wikipedia.
In a pluralistic society all those source of information can exist besides each other. If you don’t like corporatist news sources there are a lot of alternatives these days.
I don’t think “refusing” news sources is helpful. Even a bad newspaper gives some perspective on some topics that you won’t find elsewhere.
The whole idea of “news sources” is problematic. It assumes a certain 20th century model of learning about the world. If you want to get really informed about a topic it often necessary to read primary sources. I don’t get scientific news from mainstream media. I either read the papers, discussion on LW or blogs by scientists.
When I see a claim that I find interesting and where I don’t know it’s true I head over to skeptic.stackexchange and open a question. The website is no newspaper but it also serves the purpose of staying in contact with world events.
Advertising is just one biases among many. If I watch a news video at German public television that’s payed for by taxpayer money, the a German public television network pays a production company for that video. Some of those production companies also produce PR for paying customers.
A lot of articles in newspapers get these days written by freelance journalists who aren’t payed very well and can be hired for other tasks. So even if the newspaper wouldn’t make it’s money by serving corporate interest the individual journalist might still serve corporate interests.
Wikipedia illustrates that we are actually quite good at coordination. Much better than anyone would have expected 20 years ago. It just doesn’t like like we would have expected. Cultural development isn’t just more of the same.
But reading it takes time that one could spend on something else.
If you make an utility calculation than the prime concern is about whether it makes sense to learn about a topic in the first place. If you do decide to inform yourself about a topic than you have to choose among the sources that are available. If you really care about an issue than it often makes sense to read multiple perspectives.
It quite easy to read government funded Al Jazeera, a commercial newspaper by a publically traded company that makes money via advertising and network driven community websites like Stackexchange or Wikipedia.
In a pluralistic society all those source of information can exist besides each other. If you don’t like corporatist news sources there are a lot of alternatives these days.