… but I’m suggesting that Microsoft’s safety practices are as important as OpenAI’s...
Who has claimed, or even implied, otherwise?
EDIT: I’m assuming at least one alternative viewpoint was encountered previously, so it doesn’t seem like a big ask to spend 20 seconds to write down when that occurred for the benefit of the passing reader.
Perhaps I misread the implication and Zach has literally never encountered a different viewpoint on this.
I don’t have anything specific to point to; in my experience, AI safety folks pay lots more attention to OpenAI than Microsoft (because OpenAI is much better at making powerful models).
Who has claimed, or even implied, otherwise?
EDIT: I’m assuming at least one alternative viewpoint was encountered previously, so it doesn’t seem like a big ask to spend 20 seconds to write down when that occurred for the benefit of the passing reader.
Perhaps I misread the implication and Zach has literally never encountered a different viewpoint on this.
I don’t have anything specific to point to; in my experience, AI safety folks pay lots more attention to OpenAI than Microsoft (because OpenAI is much better at making powerful models).