My point is, it’s not incoherent as a stable long-term equilibrium. There’s nothing unstable about that equilibrium in the long term, literally indefinitely. The arguments from humanity’s desires don’t work, because there’s nothing in that equilibrium that converts those desires into outcomes, nothing to give those desires the power to ever destabilize the equilibrium.
Took the note, updated the intro. (2) can be stable and still be definitely-worth-avoiding, which is all the argument I am making in this piece requires.
My point is, it’s not incoherent as a stable long-term equilibrium. There’s nothing unstable about that equilibrium in the long term, literally indefinitely. The arguments from humanity’s desires don’t work, because there’s nothing in that equilibrium that converts those desires into outcomes, nothing to give those desires the power to ever destabilize the equilibrium.
Took the note, updated the intro. (2) can be stable and still be definitely-worth-avoiding, which is all the argument I am making in this piece requires.