Another point is: once people basically understand how the human brain figures things out in broad outline, there will be a “neuroscience overhang” of 100,000 papers about how the brain works in excruciating detail, and (I claim) it will rapidly become straightforward to understand and integrate all the little tricks that the brain uses into AI, if people get stuck on anything.
Oh, interesting.
It sounds like you’re saying that there’s a yet undiscovered grand theory of neuroscience, and also a bunch of “stamp collecting” about the details. We’ve done a lot of the stamp collecting already, and the grand theory would unlock the utility of the samps that we’ve collected?
Oh, interesting.
It sounds like you’re saying that there’s a yet undiscovered grand theory of neuroscience, and also a bunch of “stamp collecting” about the details. We’ve done a lot of the stamp collecting already, and the grand theory would unlock the utility of the samps that we’ve collected?