Because he won’t actually win anything, anymore than a rabbit actually disappears inside a top hat or a woman actually gets sawed in half and restored.
Debates are of limited value in this way: The correct argument can rather easily lose. WLC is a great example of why and how.
If you predict that he’ll win under every definition of “beat” that you suggest, why do you need your initial disclaimer that the definition matters?
Because he won’t actually win anything, anymore than a rabbit actually disappears inside a top hat or a woman actually gets sawed in half and restored.
Debates are of limited value in this way: The correct argument can rather easily lose. WLC is a great example of why and how.
Other than status.