What does the word swap add? Isn’t the human just going to swap the words back as part of the reconstruction? Or are you betting on the rare cases where words can be written in any order, ie: “black round” instead of “round black”?
It would also be nice to have a better idea of how the humans are supposed to be rewriting the plan. I suspect the best way to do this would be to provide an actual example of a plan being reconstructed by a human. One particular aspect I would like clarity on: how do you see the details of a plan being changed when the worry is that the plan is subtly off? Do you see this as occurring accidentally during reconstruction or is the idea that humans should intentionally change the details?
What does the word swap add? Isn’t the human just going to swap the words back as part of the reconstruction? Or are you betting on the rare cases where words can be written in any order, ie: “black round” instead of “round black”?
It would also be nice to have a better idea of how the humans are supposed to be rewriting the plan. I suspect the best way to do this would be to provide an actual example of a plan being reconstructed by a human. One particular aspect I would like clarity on: how do you see the details of a plan being changed when the worry is that the plan is subtly off? Do you see this as occurring accidentally during reconstruction or is the idea that humans should intentionally change the details?
The first point isn’t super central. FWIW I do expect that humans will occasionally not swap words back.
Humans should just look at the noised plan and try to convert it into a more reasonable-seeming, executable plan.
Edit: that is, without intentionally changing details.