No AI-centered agency (RL or otherwise) because it won’t be allowed to happen (humanity remains the sole locus or origin of agency), or because it’s not feasible to make this happen?
(Noosphere89′s point is about technical feasibility, so the intended meaning of your claim turning out to be that AI-centered agency is prevented by lack of technical feasibility seems like it would be more relevant to Noosphere89′s comment, but much more surprising.)
I suspect his reasons for believing this are close to or a subset of his reasons for changing his mind about AI stuff more broadly, so he’s likely to not respond here.
I don’t think RL or other AI-centered agency constructions will ever become very agentic.
No AI-centered agency (RL or otherwise) because it won’t be allowed to happen (humanity remains the sole locus or origin of agency), or because it’s not feasible to make this happen?
(Noosphere89′s point is about technical feasibility, so the intended meaning of your claim turning out to be that AI-centered agency is prevented by lack of technical feasibility seems like it would be more relevant to Noosphere89′s comment, but much more surprising.)
why?
I suspect his reasons for believing this are close to or a subset of his reasons for changing his mind about AI stuff more broadly, so he’s likely to not respond here.