That two boxing was what those decision theorists were taught as the ‘rational’ choice to make. So, while they are more likely to analyze unintuitive problems roughly correctly, they are hampered by the standard system taught.
(The question then becomes why the CDT background for many works does not swamp the LW-style argumentation?)
That two boxing was what those decision theorists were taught as the ‘rational’ choice to make. So, while they are more likely to analyze unintuitive problems roughly correctly, they are hampered by the standard system taught.
(The question then becomes why the CDT background for many works does not swamp the LW-style argumentation?)