Clarify what “looking for more relationship partners” means. Perhaps being open to more relationship partners (but not looking actively) should be distinguished from actively looking and from not being open to new partners.
“Planning on having more children”—what’s the time frame on that? Am I planning to have more children at some point, or in the near future?
For “Religious Background”, there should probably be a “Protestant” option before “Other Christian”. It doesn’t make much sense to lump Eastern Orthodoxy and Protestantism into one group while having Catholics in a separate group.
For “Moral Views”, make these checkboxes (check as many as apply) rather than mutually exclusive selections, because it’s possible to be both a virtue ethicist and a consequentialist, or alternatively a virtue ethicist and a deontologist.
For “Alternative Alternative Politics”, these should also be checkboxes, as some of these aren’t mutually exclusive.
I’m looking forward to the survey. Thanks for doing this again.
Clarify what “looking for more relationship partners” means. Perhaps being open to more relationship partners (but not looking actively) should be distinguished from actively looking and from not being open to new partners.
I thought the same too, but I couldn’t think of any decent wording for “open to more relationship partners (but not looking actively)”.
For “Moral Views”, make these checkboxes (check as many as apply) rather than mutually exclusive selections, because it’s possible to be both a virtue ethicist and a consequentialist, or alternatively a virtue ethicist and a deontologist.
Do rule consequentialists simultaneously count both as consequentialists and deontologists?
I thought the same too, but I couldn’t think of any decent wording for “open to more relationship partners (but not looking actively)”.
Perhaps the three options should be something like “Actively looking for new relationship partners”, “Open to new relationship partners, but not actively looking” and “Not open to new relationship partners”.
Do rule consequentialists simultaneously count both as consequentialists and deontologists?
Probably not, Consequentialism is fundamentally concerned with consequences (hence the name), which makes it and deontology mutually exclusive.
Perhaps the three options should be something like “Actively looking for new relationship partners”, “Open to new relationship partners, but not actively looking” and “Not open to new relationship partners”.
Excellent.
Probably not, Consequentialism is fundamentally concerned with consequences (hence the name), which makes it and deontology mutually exclusive.
So consequentialism be it (as I voted in the last two surveys).
Modifications to existing questions:
Clarify what “looking for more relationship partners” means. Perhaps being open to more relationship partners (but not looking actively) should be distinguished from actively looking and from not being open to new partners.
“Planning on having more children”—what’s the time frame on that? Am I planning to have more children at some point, or in the near future?
For “Religious Background”, there should probably be a “Protestant” option before “Other Christian”. It doesn’t make much sense to lump Eastern Orthodoxy and Protestantism into one group while having Catholics in a separate group.
For “Moral Views”, make these checkboxes (check as many as apply) rather than mutually exclusive selections, because it’s possible to be both a virtue ethicist and a consequentialist, or alternatively a virtue ethicist and a deontologist.
For “Alternative Alternative Politics”, these should also be checkboxes, as some of these aren’t mutually exclusive.
I’m looking forward to the survey. Thanks for doing this again.
Another suggestion, which I like, is to replace “no” with “not now” and “never.”
I thought the same too, but I couldn’t think of any decent wording for “open to more relationship partners (but not looking actively)”.
Do rule consequentialists simultaneously count both as consequentialists and deontologists?
Perhaps the three options should be something like “Actively looking for new relationship partners”, “Open to new relationship partners, but not actively looking” and “Not open to new relationship partners”.
Probably not, Consequentialism is fundamentally concerned with consequences (hence the name), which makes it and deontology mutually exclusive.
Excellent.
So consequentialism be it (as I voted in the last two surveys).