As you say, the addition of logits is equivalent to the multiplication of odds. And odds are related to probability with o=p1−p. (One can view them as different scalings of the same quantity. Probabilities have the range [0,1], odds have the range [0,+∞], and logits have the range [−∞,+∞].)
Now a well-known fact about multiplication of probabilities P is this:
P(A)×P(B)=P(A∧B), when A and B are independent.
But there is a similar fact about the multiplication of odds O, though not at all well-known:
O(A)×O(B)=O(A∧B∣A↔B), when A and B are independent.
That is, multiplying the odds of two independent events/propositions gives you the probability of their conjunction, given that their biconditional is true, i.e. given that they have the same truth values / that they either both happen or both don’t happen.
Perhaps this yields some more insight in how to interpret practical logit addition.
As you say, the addition of logits is equivalent to the multiplication of odds. And odds are related to probability with o=p1−p. (One can view them as different scalings of the same quantity. Probabilities have the range [0,1], odds have the range [0,+∞], and logits have the range [−∞,+∞].)
Now a well-known fact about multiplication of probabilities P is this:
P(A)×P(B)=P(A∧B), when A and B are independent.
But there is a similar fact about the multiplication of odds O, though not at all well-known:
O(A)×O(B)=O(A∧B∣A↔B), when A and B are independent.
That is, multiplying the odds of two independent events/propositions gives you the probability of their conjunction, given that their biconditional is true, i.e. given that they have the same truth values / that they either both happen or both don’t happen.
Perhaps this yields some more insight in how to interpret practical logit addition.