I know this has no chance of happening in a real government anytime soon, but I’d still like to talk about it.
That depends very much of what you mean with real government. There no reason why the student body of an university can’t be persuaded to elect their Student Government President that way.
Various open source projects govern themselves through complex processes.
LessWrong didn’t use an election to pick a moderator but we could have, if we would believe that a democratic process would have been better.
If you think you have a system for better governance than it’s a mistake to focus mainly on the national level. It’s bad to suggest that the national level should switch to a system that hasn’t proved it’s worth on a smaller scale.
As a young and idealist college student who wants to change governance, student self governance is the ideal playground. On the one hand you are facing smart people who have other interests than you, on the other hand you don’t mess up too much if you get things wrong.
That depends very much of what you mean with real government. There no reason why the student body of an university can’t be persuaded to elect their Student Government President that way.
Many folks’ response to advocacy of weird voting systems seems to be something like — “The only reason you would advocate that weird voting system is because it gives your party some sort of sneaky advantage. I don’t know enough about voting systems to know what that sneaky advantage is, but I know enough about humans to know that you’re up to something.”
Have you been in any discussion with practical implications about a voting system, based on which you make that statement or is your experience mainly about talking with people who don’t have an influence on actual voting systems?
What kind of pitch did you gave in favor of another voting system?
If all you can say is “the math is more beautiful” than that’s likely not going to convince anyone.
That depends very much of what you mean with real government. There no reason why the student body of an university can’t be persuaded to elect their Student Government President that way.
Various open source projects govern themselves through complex processes.
LessWrong didn’t use an election to pick a moderator but we could have, if we would believe that a democratic process would have been better.
If you think you have a system for better governance than it’s a mistake to focus mainly on the national level. It’s bad to suggest that the national level should switch to a system that hasn’t proved it’s worth on a smaller scale.
As a young and idealist college student who wants to change governance, student self governance is the ideal playground. On the one hand you are facing smart people who have other interests than you, on the other hand you don’t mess up too much if you get things wrong.
Many folks’ response to advocacy of weird voting systems seems to be something like — “The only reason you would advocate that weird voting system is because it gives your party some sort of sneaky advantage. I don’t know enough about voting systems to know what that sneaky advantage is, but I know enough about humans to know that you’re up to something.”
Have you been in any discussion with practical implications about a voting system, based on which you make that statement or is your experience mainly about talking with people who don’t have an influence on actual voting systems?
It was, in fact, to do with student government. :)
What kind of pitch did you gave in favor of another voting system? If all you can say is “the math is more beautiful” than that’s likely not going to convince anyone.