and say they didn’t really have the interactions they said they had with BhTV folk
I’m not denying which interactions they had. I’m claiming that they would have had exactly the same reaction to the Behe video without being primed by the Nelson video. Maybe “lying” is too harsh, but I stand by the claim that no one actually cares about the other video. People I see linking to Zimmer and Carroll, like Eliezer, usually don’t mention the first video. People who bring it up in the comments to those posts don’t name Nelson.
They’ve both stated that they contacted BhTV and expressed concern about the creationist being on BEFORE Behe was on. I don’t know how you can square that with the belief that they didn’t care about the creationist being on at all and that they would have felt exactly the same way about Behe regardless. You have yet to offer evidence or make an argument, and you are calling them liars, because they’ve publicly said having Nelson on was disturbing and a contributing factor.
I’m not denying which interactions they had. I’m claiming that they would have had exactly the same reaction to the Behe video without being primed by the Nelson video. Maybe “lying” is too harsh, but I stand by the claim that no one actually cares about the other video. People I see linking to Zimmer and Carroll, like Eliezer, usually don’t mention the first video. People who bring it up in the comments to those posts don’t name Nelson.
They’ve both stated that they contacted BhTV and expressed concern about the creationist being on BEFORE Behe was on. I don’t know how you can square that with the belief that they didn’t care about the creationist being on at all and that they would have felt exactly the same way about Behe regardless. You have yet to offer evidence or make an argument, and you are calling them liars, because they’ve publicly said having Nelson on was disturbing and a contributing factor.