Please no set notation! The arrow brackets are on thin ice I think.
I meant what I said above, I think there’s something really good about having a Bayes explanation that requires no symbols not on a standard keyboard and no math an on-track fourth grader wouldn’t know.
(And also, thank you both for improving this! I recognize you two are the ones in the arena at the moment and I wish I was able to help refine this more.)
Another proposal! (I think I’m too close to this to really judge what’s best.)
// ODDS = YEP:NOPE
YEP = MAKE SOMETHING UP WHATEVER LOL
ASSUME YEP
FOR EACH E IN EVIDENCE
YEP *= HOW SURPRISING IS E?
ASSUME E
THROW ASSUMPTIONS IN TRASH
NOPE = MAKE SOMETHING UP WHATEVER LOL
ASSUME NOPE
FOR EACH E IN EVIDENCE
YEP *= HOW SURPRISING IS E?
ASSUME E
Please no set notation! The arrow brackets are on thin ice I think.
I meant what I said above, I think there’s something really good about having a Bayes explanation that requires no symbols not on a standard keyboard and no math an on-track fourth grader wouldn’t know.
(And also, thank you both for improving this! I recognize you two are the ones in the arena at the moment and I wish I was able to help refine this more.)
Another proposal! (I think I’m too close to this to really judge what’s best.)