my claim is on the margin. It is about apportioning effort amongst the parliament of values such that we get strong advocates for marginal views that carry some value.
I think I understand your argument. Mine is that it your proposition selects equally for truly heinous things that a few misguided people think are just. Most recent example I can think of is forced birth. Some people think it’s good, it’s opposed by a majority, but it leads to a default of bad outcomes (unequal rights based on biological sex, increased probability of death for problematic pregnancies, psychological trauma for rape victims, etc.)
I just can’t see a just society being possible by your proposition.
my claim is on the margin. It is about apportioning effort amongst the parliament of values such that we get strong advocates for marginal views that carry some value.
I think I understand your argument. Mine is that it your proposition selects equally for truly heinous things that a few misguided people think are just. Most recent example I can think of is forced birth. Some people think it’s good, it’s opposed by a majority, but it leads to a default of bad outcomes (unequal rights based on biological sex, increased probability of death for problematic pregnancies, psychological trauma for rape victims, etc.)
I just can’t see a just society being possible by your proposition.