I think you’re entangling morals and strategy very close together in your statements.
Moral sense: We should leave this to future ASI to decide based on our values for whether or not we inherently owe the agent for existing or for helping us.
Strategy: Once we’ve detached the moral part, this is then just the same thing that the post is doing of trying to commit that certain aspects are enforced, and what the parent commenter is saying they hold suspect.
So I think this just turns into a restating the same core argument between the two positions.
I think you’re entangling morals and strategy very close together in your statements. Moral sense: We should leave this to future ASI to decide based on our values for whether or not we inherently owe the agent for existing or for helping us. Strategy: Once we’ve detached the moral part, this is then just the same thing that the post is doing of trying to commit that certain aspects are enforced, and what the parent commenter is saying they hold suspect. So I think this just turns into a restating the same core argument between the two positions.