My thinking for Game of Thrones belonging to Gryffindor (though at this point it might just be cognitive dissonance, so please let me know if it sounds right) is that the first book—A Game of Thrones—most heavily features Ned Stark, the paragon of honor and principle. I’m wishing that I had put another Song of Fire and Ice book on the Slytherin shelf to show contrast...
On the other hand, Ned Stark trgf rkrphgrq sbe uvf gebhoyr naq snvyf gb cerirag n pvivy jne. Ur hcubyqf ubabe naq cevapvcyrf, ohg qbrfa’g trg n ybg bs zvyrntr bhg bs gurz.
I see your point, but I agree with Desrtopa’s reply. I would go further and say that Arq’f ubabe abg bayl snvyrq gb cerirag pvivy jne, vg npgviryl pnhfrq vg (ol jneavat Prefrv bs jung ur unq qvfpbirerq, naq yngre erwrpgvat Erayl’f naq Yvggyrsvatre’f zber frafvoyr cynaf sbe nibvqvat one). So I think he makes more sense as an example for Slytherins of how Gryffindor values are foolish and counterproductive.
The Strategy of Conflict also seems like it should be moved from the Gryffindor bookshelf to the Slytherin. EY described it as “Forget rationalist Judo: this is rationalist eye-gouging, rationalist gang warfare, rationalist nuclear deterrence. Techniques that let you win, but you don’t want to look in the mirror afterward.”
EY described it as “Forget rationalist Judo: this is rationalist eye-gouging, rationalist gang warfare, rationalist nuclear deterrence. Techniques that let you win, but you don’t want to look in the mirror afterward.”
Most fantasy books might be Gryffindor, but A Game of Thrones? Totally Slytherin.
My thinking for Game of Thrones belonging to Gryffindor (though at this point it might just be cognitive dissonance, so please let me know if it sounds right) is that the first book—A Game of Thrones—most heavily features Ned Stark, the paragon of honor and principle. I’m wishing that I had put another Song of Fire and Ice book on the Slytherin shelf to show contrast...
On the other hand, Ned Stark trgf rkrphgrq sbe uvf gebhoyr naq snvyf gb cerirag n pvivy jne. Ur hcubyqf ubabe naq cevapvcyrf, ohg qbrfa’g trg n ybg bs zvyrntr bhg bs gurz.
I see your point, but I agree with Desrtopa’s reply. I would go further and say that Arq’f ubabe abg bayl snvyrq gb cerirag pvivy jne, vg npgviryl pnhfrq vg (ol jneavat Prefrv bs jung ur unq qvfpbirerq, naq yngre erwrpgvat Erayl’f naq Yvggyrsvatre’f zber frafvoyr cynaf sbe nibvqvat one). So I think he makes more sense as an example for Slytherins of how Gryffindor values are foolish and counterproductive.
That was my thought with Thucydides.
The Strategy of Conflict also seems like it should be moved from the Gryffindor bookshelf to the Slytherin. EY described it as “Forget rationalist Judo: this is rationalist eye-gouging, rationalist gang warfare, rationalist nuclear deterrence. Techniques that let you win, but you don’t want to look in the mirror afterward.”
Nope, that was cousin it.
Whoops. Thanks; that post just seemed like part of the sequences in my memory.
The Strategy of Conflict is in both Slytherin and Gryffindor. I guess Jesse had two copies.