The original post makes the (true) claim that any coherent observations are evidence against being a BB. I’m making the pedantic point that if you are almost certain that the real universe is BB dominated, then observing that that is indeed true suggests you might not be a BB. (Conversely: a person convinced that the universe is BB dominated would take observations suggesting it wasn’t as increasing their likelihood of being a BB. (and also the likelihood that they’re wrong about cosmology, but I’m assuming that starts tiny))
This exact point is raised and made in the original post, no?
The original post makes the (true) claim that any coherent observations are evidence against being a BB. I’m making the pedantic point that if you are almost certain that the real universe is BB dominated, then observing that that is indeed true suggests you might not be a BB.
(Conversely: a person convinced that the universe is BB dominated would take observations suggesting it wasn’t as increasing their likelihood of being a BB. (and also the likelihood that they’re wrong about cosmology, but I’m assuming that starts tiny))