Ah, ok. I changed it because I thought I misread you.
Anyway, yeah, if Bob has a valid argument against (2) - if he can prove that X is compatible with all evidence so far—that seems useful and non-vacuous to me. I’ve edited the post to make this clearer.
Ah, ok. I changed it because I thought I misread you.
Anyway, yeah, if Bob has a valid argument against (2) - if he can prove that X is compatible with all evidence so far—that seems useful and non-vacuous to me. I’ve edited the post to make this clearer.