Simplest would be: someone gave his Claude Code a task to create a new bird flu virus which can kill almost everyone and the agent found a brilliant new way to bypass the need of RNA-synthesis and instead made some smilingly unrelated internet orders..
Simplest would be: someone gave his Claude Code a task to create a new bird flu virus which can kill almost everyone and the agent found a brilliant new way to bypass the need of RNA-synthesis and instead made some smilingly unrelated internet orders..
Fair, depending on your priors there’s definitely an important sense in which something like Reardon’s case is simpler:
https://frommatter.substack.com/p/the-bone-simple-case-for-ai-x-risk
I’d be interested in someone else trying to rewrite his article while removing in-group jargon and tacit assumptions!