I you link to a collection of your thoughts, than you should shortly give a summary to the articles you link. Formatting your post so that the links look nice and don’t contain “0B9BZfCmYSqm-TTlfRW1h” would also make your post more appealing.
As for the linked document it lacks separation into paragraphs. It contain a bunch of ideas thrown together without good structure.
You make complex arguments about voting procedures when that’s not central to starting a new group. Leadership at local LW meetups is mostly chosen because someone wants to put in the effort to be a leader. You don’t need competitive elections.
I would like to start by discussing the ideas in the google drive folder that I shared and move from there.
English provides multiple ways to parse that sentence.
The first is based on instrumental rationality, and I’d like to call it Success Club
Is the group that you want to have something that’s commonly called a mastermind group? If so, why don’t you use that term?
You haven’t said what kind of communication forms the groups are going to use.
I you link to a collection of your thoughts, than you should shortly give a summary to the articles you link. Formatting your post so that the links look nice and don’t contain “0B9BZfCmYSqm-TTlfRW1h” would also make your post more appealing.
As for the linked document it lacks separation into paragraphs. It contain a bunch of ideas thrown together without good structure. You make complex arguments about voting procedures when that’s not central to starting a new group. Leadership at local LW meetups is mostly chosen because someone wants to put in the effort to be a leader. You don’t need competitive elections.
English provides multiple ways to parse that sentence.
Is the group that you want to have something that’s commonly called a mastermind group? If so, why don’t you use that term?
You haven’t said what kind of communication forms the groups are going to use.