That notion doesn’t bother me in the least, but if we’re talking about the physics that happen for us, it’s the Schrodinger Equation, and the Born Rule is the ‘angle’ to take on finding us in it. Anything else isn’t us, and we can’t do experiments on it, so we ought to avoid making strong claims.
That notion doesn’t bother me in the least, but if we’re talking about the physics that happen for us, it’s the Schrodinger Equation, and the Born Rule is the ‘angle’ to take on finding us in it. Anything else isn’t us, and we can’t do experiments on it, so we ought to avoid making strong claims.
Then I don’t understand on what grounds you reject the Born Rule but keep the Schrodinger Equation.
Because the Schrodinger Equation governs the absolute dynamics.
Let me draw an analogy to what things would be like if the world weren’t quantum.
Schrodinger Equation + form of the Hamiltonian : Born Rule + neuroscience
::
Newton’s 2nd Law + force rules : “Some of those masses are what we’re made of..” + neuroscience