That is to say, distinctions like universalist/particularist, conversion/heritage, and concepts like orthodoxy, orthopraxy, reification, etc… are useful for thinking about apparently “non-religious” ideologies (including, to some extent, my own).
How do you know that it’s useful? What evidence do you have to support that belief in addition to feeling that it’s useful?
How do you know that it’s useful? What evidence do you have to support that belief in addition to feeling that it’s useful?