But that sounds like it means “not even wrong”...
Yeah, it also just occurred to me, after I typed that comment, that wronger than wrong would also be a valid interpretation of this. Perhaps I ought let whoever made the change to interpret it, instead of offering my guesses. :-)
Good point. I guess ‘<’ is meant to be read “less”, rather than the standard “less than”.
But that sounds like it means “not even wrong”...
Yeah, it also just occurred to me, after I typed that comment, that wronger than wrong would also be a valid interpretation of this. Perhaps I ought let whoever made the change to interpret it, instead of offering my guesses. :-)
Good point. I guess ‘<’ is meant to be read “less”, rather than the standard “less than”.