Other possible agents may have their own drives or imperatives, but those should not be regarded as “moralities”—that’s the import of the second idea.
He seems to believe that, but I dont see why anyone else should. Its like saying English is the only language, or the Earth is the only planet. If morality is having values, any number of entities could have values. If it’s rules for living in groups, ditto. If it’s fairness, ditto.
This is all strictly phrased in computational terms too
It’s not strictly phrased at all..It’s very hard to follow what he’s saying...or particularly computational.
He seems to believe that, but I dont see why anyone else should. Its like saying English is the only language, or the Earth is the only planet. If morality is having values, any number of entities could have values. If it’s rules for living in groups, ditto. If it’s fairness, ditto.
It’s not strictly phrased at all..It’s very hard to follow what he’s saying...or particularly computational.