But I think the premise behind the question is flawed. Trying to pick a Schelling point for your proposal that is an anti-Schelling point (not subject to the costs and pressures of current population centers) for very similar communities is not feasible, unless you can identify distinct attributes of this community that lead to different needs.
Seattle, WA, USA for me.
But I think the premise behind the question is flawed. Trying to pick a Schelling point for your proposal that is an anti-Schelling point (not subject to the costs and pressures of current population centers) for very similar communities is not feasible, unless you can identify distinct attributes of this community that lead to different needs.