Ah I’ve got a guess now: there’s a rubric we added to give AI suggestions of how to improve their notes, with a checklist of 7 features associated with notes that have been most useful in the past.
That’s only one of like 5-10 ways we incorporated AI this year, and the rubric is a nudge rather than a requirement, but I get how someone could have experienced it as “this rubric is the required way to evaluate proposals, yuck.”
Ah, yes, that sounds very similar to what I heard. I reference that in this section a bit, so I think I shouldn’t put it back:
Third, I expect to rebuild the tools for getting AI systems to assist with evaluations from the ground up, mostly just because I don’t like the current rubric-based system and want to give evaluators more freedom on how to leverage AI systems in evaluating grants.
Ah I’ve got a guess now: there’s a rubric we added to give AI suggestions of how to improve their notes, with a checklist of 7 features associated with notes that have been most useful in the past.
That’s only one of like 5-10 ways we incorporated AI this year, and the rubric is a nudge rather than a requirement, but I get how someone could have experienced it as “this rubric is the required way to evaluate proposals, yuck.”
Ah, yes, that sounds very similar to what I heard. I reference that in this section a bit, so I think I shouldn’t put it back:
Appreciate the clarification!