Maybe a reductive summary is “general is good if outer alignment is easy but inner alignment is hard, but bad in the opposite case”
Isn’t it the other way around ?
If inner alignment is hard then general is bad because applying less selection pressure, i.e. more generally, more simplicity prior, means more daemons/gremlins
Maybe a reductive summary is “general is good if outer alignment is easy but inner alignment is hard, but bad in the opposite case”
Isn’t it the other way around ?
If inner alignment is hard then general is bad because applying less selection pressure, i.e. more generally, more simplicity prior, means more daemons/gremlins