Better would be to predict that the comment will have, say, between −10 and 0 karma. Would the audience who dislike this type of comments downvote to hurt the author’s karma, or upvote to frustrate his prediction?
(I am not going to do the experiment myself—the first time it is slightly amusing, the second time it would be annoying. But if somebody doesn’t mind being annoying...)
Better would be to predict that the comment will have, say, between −10 and 0 karma. Would the audience who dislike this type of comments downvote to hurt the author’s karma, or upvote to frustrate his prediction?
Better would be to predict that the comment will have, say, between −10 and 0 karma. Would the audience who dislike this type of comments downvote to hurt the author’s karma, or upvote to frustrate his prediction?
(I am not going to do the experiment myself—the first time it is slightly amusing, the second time it would be annoying. But if somebody doesn’t mind being annoying...)
I would downvote for annoyingness.
We’re really good at this sort of group coordination: −20 karma for sure :)
So modify: predict that the karma will be negative with 90% confidence.