So the ratio of success to failure in the set is almost meaningless,
Meaningless seems too strong – you seem to be assuming a very strong selection effect – what selection effect are you assuming?
In any case, we’re not simply counting successes and failures.
systematic differences between the failures and successes could be interesting.
We’re looking at this.
Meaningless seems too strong – you seem to be assuming a very strong selection effect – what selection effect are you assuming?
In any case, we’re not simply counting successes and failures.
We’re looking at this.