Is there something in the article that’s new and worth reading if you are already with the discussion from a few years ago?
Not really :-) I’d forgotten about the earlier post until Gwern mentioned it below. (I’d even commented on that thread.)
Is there something in the article that’s new and worth reading if you are already with the discussion from a few years ago?
Not really :-) I’d forgotten about the earlier post until Gwern mentioned it below. (I’d even commented on that thread.)