Science leaves it up to experiment to socially declare who was right, but if there weren’t some people who could get it right in the absence of overwhelming experimental proof, science would be stuck.
Given that there are also many people who get it wrong, this seems like a case of hindsight bias on EY’s part.
Given that there are also many people who get it wrong, this seems like a case of hindsight bias on EY’s part.
I’d point you to the next post, “Einstein’s Speed”, specifically the section at the end beginning with the phrase “But a word of caution here”.