I mean, the psychiatric patient wouldn’t say that, the same way that a crackpot wouldn’t actually give a long explanation of why they’re allowed to use the inside view. But they could, and according to modesty, That’s Terrible.
Why does it matter more that you could hypothise a crackpot who who would act that way than what we learned empirically about how crackpots actually behave?
If the goal is to not go into the trap of being a crackpot than it’s very worthwhile to reason based on how actual crackpots behave.
Why does it matter more that you could hypothise a crackpot who who would act that way than what we learned empirically about how crackpots actually behave?
If the goal is to not go into the trap of being a crackpot than it’s very worthwhile to reason based on how actual crackpots behave.