A trivialist would insist that “Trivialists argue ¬(p∧¬p) is false” is true. Believing that you’re arguing something isn’t quite the same as arguing something, but I wanted to point out that under trivialism, trivialists think they’re arguing for and against all propositions simultaneously.
Pfft, I don’t see what’s so funny about the end. If it had been nvDashpwedgenegp, alright, that would have been somewhat ironic at least, but
)? Nobody was even arguing against that.I saw “You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.” as the amusing ending...
Trivialists are!
But they weren’t. Trivialists certainly do assert that
) is true, and so is pwedgenegpA trivialist would insist that “Trivialists argue ¬(p∧¬p) is false” is true. Believing that you’re arguing something isn’t quite the same as arguing something, but I wanted to point out that under trivialism, trivialists think they’re arguing for and against all propositions simultaneously.