A trivialist would insist that “Trivialists argue ¬(p∧¬p) is false” is true. Believing that you’re arguing something isn’t quite the same as arguing something, but I wanted to point out that under trivialism, trivialists think they’re arguing for and against all propositions simultaneously.
But they weren’t. Trivialists certainly do assert that
) is true, and so is pwedgenegpA trivialist would insist that “Trivialists argue ¬(p∧¬p) is false” is true. Believing that you’re arguing something isn’t quite the same as arguing something, but I wanted to point out that under trivialism, trivialists think they’re arguing for and against all propositions simultaneously.