I think we have an ontology mismatch. I’m not that interested in arguing about AI-in-a-box like stuff because I don’t expect that to be a realistic hypothetical. The affordances we currently give AIs, including in internally deployed models, are already much higher than that.
I think we have an ontology mismatch. I’m not that interested in arguing about AI-in-a-box like stuff because I don’t expect that to be a realistic hypothetical. The affordances we currently give AIs, including in internally deployed models, are already much higher than that.
GPT-4o and some other AIs have already demonstrated the propensity to make delirious claims and have the user believe them.
How similar is this to superpersuasion on which you work?
I expect it’s related but noncentral. I think crazy people are harder to use, especially long-term.