As a test: for every idea in the above list, can you think of a nontrivial real example of a dispute where one or both parties in an intellectual disagreement likely failed to model this concept? If not, you might be missing something about each idea!
I don’t follow how / why this test is supposed to work.
Can you give an example of “a nontrivial real example of a dispute where one or both parties in an intellectual disagreement likely failed to model [one of these concepts]” and how that is indicative of if you’re missing something or not?
It seems like I could understand any of these points, but not be able to think of places where others are missing them?
I don’t follow how / why this test is supposed to work.
Can you give an example of “a nontrivial real example of a dispute where one or both parties in an intellectual disagreement likely failed to model [one of these concepts]” and how that is indicative of if you’re missing something or not?
It seems like I could understand any of these points, but not be able to think of places where others are missing them?
Check out https://linch.substack.com/p/unknown-knowns