It starts with an irrelevant AI image. Why? And then the “how hard is AI safety” image is embedded in the middle of unrelated text.
It conflates different things under a single word “safety”, eg:
We quickly learned that labs that prioritized speed captured the market as users actively revolted against overly preachy models. Safety shifted from an idealized differentiator to an impediment to market dominance.
While I could be wrong, that also seems like AI-edited text.
It has “12 months” in the title and then has no justification for that particular number.
The image is fun and nice. And the how hard is ai safety image is a good mental model to keep people engaged with problem as they read.
Yes safety and alignment are catch all terms but the teams have cascading impacts onto product, from preachiness to aesthetic to annoyance in enterprise to “move fast and break things” style of deployment for ARR ramp. I don’t think this was AI-edited AFAIK.
12 months is a barometer, the ending discusses how it could be shorter, but a key anchor point is that both labs are heading for IPOs and commercial progress (which is inhabited by safety today, in theory) is a key determinant. I think it’s quite likely within 12 months at least 1 lab is public.
I downvoted because:
It starts with an irrelevant AI image. Why? And then the “how hard is AI safety” image is embedded in the middle of unrelated text.
It conflates different things under a single word “safety”, eg:
While I could be wrong, that also seems like AI-edited text.
It has “12 months” in the title and then has no justification for that particular number.
The image is fun and nice. And the how hard is ai safety image is a good mental model to keep people engaged with problem as they read.
Yes safety and alignment are catch all terms but the teams have cascading impacts onto product, from preachiness to aesthetic to annoyance in enterprise to “move fast and break things” style of deployment for ARR ramp. I don’t think this was AI-edited AFAIK.
12 months is a barometer, the ending discusses how it could be shorter, but a key anchor point is that both labs are heading for IPOs and commercial progress (which is inhabited by safety today, in theory) is a key determinant. I think it’s quite likely within 12 months at least 1 lab is public.