To give a counter example: If one part of my body has been hijacked by a virus and is producing viral cells, I would want all the other parts of my body to fight back against that infection, rather than leave that part alone. Similarly when you talk about conflicts within organizations of societies, you should want people to take sides in a dispute between managers if one of them is embezzling or committing crimes.
So I think your model is beneficial for some forms of conflict but not others. You could perhaps draw a line for action at “things that threaten the viability of the whole setup” But the delineation of that would become its own controversy
To give a counter example: If one part of my body has been hijacked by a virus and is producing viral cells, I would want all the other parts of my body to fight back against that infection, rather than leave that part alone. Similarly when you talk about conflicts within organizations of societies, you should want people to take sides in a dispute between managers if one of them is embezzling or committing crimes.
So I think your model is beneficial for some forms of conflict but not others. You could perhaps draw a line for action at “things that threaten the viability of the whole setup” But the delineation of that would become its own controversy