Could you please clarify what parts of the making of the above comment were done by a human being, and what parts by an AI?
[EDITED to add, in case it isn’t already clear from Pablo’s comment:] The above is not a response to what Kaj wrote that’s now its parent, but to a different comment that has since been deleted for being AI-generated spam. I was, of course, not suggesting that Kaj’s comment was AI-generated.
I deleted and banned the user, their last 3 comments were clearly AI generated and followed the usual AI-slop structure. Sorry for this one slipping through the cracks.
Meta: gjm’s comment appears at the same level as comments that directly reply to Kaj’s original shortform. So until I read your own comment, I assumed they, too, were replying to Kaj. I think deleting a comment shouldn’t alter the hierarchy of other comments in that thread.
Oops, that’s a weird side-effect of the way we implemented spam purging (which is a more aggressive form of deletion than we usually use). We should really fix some bugs related to that implementation.
Could you please clarify what parts of the making of the above comment were done by a human being, and what parts by an AI?
[EDITED to add, in case it isn’t already clear from Pablo’s comment:] The above is not a response to what Kaj wrote that’s now its parent, but to a different comment that has since been deleted for being AI-generated spam. I was, of course, not suggesting that Kaj’s comment was AI-generated.
I deleted and banned the user, their last 3 comments were clearly AI generated and followed the usual AI-slop structure. Sorry for this one slipping through the cracks.
Meta: gjm’s comment appears at the same level as comments that directly reply to Kaj’s original shortform. So until I read your own comment, I assumed they, too, were replying to Kaj. I think deleting a comment shouldn’t alter the hierarchy of other comments in that thread.
Oops, that’s a weird side-effect of the way we implemented spam purging (which is a more aggressive form of deletion than we usually use). We should really fix some bugs related to that implementation.