If not, then downvoters/non-upvoters, please explain why a post that could pass as human-written but which is honest about being ai-written would not get your upvote if it was honest about its origin.
Interesting. But if you would have upvoted it if you didn’t know it was AI, and now you know it’s AI, then now you know it’s not the prompter’s testimony, but it still passes muster as a high quality series of claims; and, in this hypothetical, it’s structured [edit: as] prompt—one which I would consider high quality, and so I predict you would too—and a resulting post, in a collapseable section (perhaps expanded by default, in the hypothetical world where this is made into an acceptable way to post for trusted users, or some such thing). Would any of these considerations change your vote, or no but further discussion may find the crux quickly, or do they make you think further discussion is unlikely to sway the crux?
I can imagine upvoting it if I would have upvoted the prompt alone. I’m also not completely dogmatic about this, but I would be very disappointed if it became the norm, for basically the reasons Tsvi mentioned.
LLM-generated text is not testimony
Interesting. But if you would have upvoted it if you didn’t know it was AI, and now you know it’s AI, then now you know it’s not the prompter’s testimony, but it still passes muster as a high quality series of claims; and, in this hypothetical, it’s structured [edit: as] prompt—one which I would consider high quality, and so I predict you would too—and a resulting post, in a collapseable section (perhaps expanded by default, in the hypothetical world where this is made into an acceptable way to post for trusted users, or some such thing). Would any of these considerations change your vote, or no but further discussion may find the crux quickly, or do they make you think further discussion is unlikely to sway the crux?
I can imagine upvoting it if I would have upvoted the prompt alone. I’m also not completely dogmatic about this, but I would be very disappointed if it became the norm, for basically the reasons Tsvi mentioned.