This is from 2008 so who knows if it still matters at all, but in the metaethics sequence Eliezer says this:
(Disclaimer: Neither Subhan nor Obert represent my own position on morality; rather they represent different sides of the questions I hope to answer.)
about two characters in a Socrates dialogue that are moral realist and anti-realist, respectively.
I once tried to read the entire sequence to figure out what Eliezer thinks about morality but then abandoned the project before completing it. I still don’t know what he thinks.
(Not sure if I’m telling you anything new or if this was even worth saying.)
I got o3 to compare Eliezer’s metaethics with that of Brand Blanshard (who has some similar ideas), with particular attention to whether morality is subjective or objective. The result...
This is from 2008 so who knows if it still matters at all, but in the metaethics sequence Eliezer says this:
about two characters in a Socrates dialogue that are moral realist and anti-realist, respectively.
I once tried to read the entire sequence to figure out what Eliezer thinks about morality but then abandoned the project before completing it. I still don’t know what he thinks.
(Not sure if I’m telling you anything new or if this was even worth saying.)
I got o3 to compare Eliezer’s metaethics with that of Brand Blanshard (who has some similar ideas), with particular attention to whether morality is subjective or objective. The result...