(or at the least a definite change, and it certainly feels like an improvement)
Let’s say you have infinitely many people with utility 0 and infinitely many people with utility 1. Then changing one person’s utility to 0.5 is a definite change, but does it feel like an improvement?
the only way of ensuring that you’ve got an improvement overall is to ensure that (almost) everyone shares in the improvement—to at least a small extent.
Let’s say you have infinitely many people with utility 0 and infinitely many people with utility 1. Then changing one person’s utility to 2 is a definite change, but does it feel like an improvement?
Duplicating happy people is still ineffective in the bounded cases.
Let’s say you have infinitely many people with utility 0, infinitely many people with utility 1, and one person with utility 2. Then duplicating that person is a definite change, but does it feel like an improvement?
Let’s say you have infinitely many people with utility 0 and infinitely many people with utility 1. Then changing one person’s utility to 0.5 is a definite change, but does it feel like an improvement?
Let’s say you have infinitely many people with utility 0 and infinitely many people with utility 1. Then changing one person’s utility to 2 is a definite change, but does it feel like an improvement?
Let’s say you have infinitely many people with utility 0, infinitely many people with utility 1, and one person with utility 2. Then duplicating that person is a definite change, but does it feel like an improvement?