This is a brutal oversimplification, but it seems to me, roughly speaking, that in mis-identifying fundamentalism with the humanities, they tend to advocate a reductionism that re-writes science itself in the image of a priestly authoritarianism with too much in common with the very fundamentalisms they claim to disdain (and rightly so).
The author understandably distances himself from his own output, reminiscent of the passages ridiculed in “Politics and the English Language”.
With detractors like this, who needs supporters? I almost wonder whether razib wrote that blog post in one of his faux-postmodernist moods.
I advise you all not to read it; badly written and badly supported criticism of EY is too powerful of a biasing agent towards him.
The author understandably distances himself from his own output, reminiscent of the passages ridiculed in “Politics and the English Language”.