Given that King Arthur is estimated to have lived in the 5th-6th century AD, while Ramesses II was born 1303 BC, Ramesses’ reference to King Arthur is actually a hint that this conversation occurred >1000 years later than the reader expects—and therefore Moses should realize that Ramesses’ resurrection has already occurred, and he should update in favor of it being possible.
Given that King Arthur is estimated to have lived in the 5th-6th century AD, while Ramesses II was born 1303 BC, Ramesses’ reference to King Arthur is actually a hint that this conversation occurred >1000 years later than the reader expects—and therefore Moses should realize that Ramesses’ resurrection has already occurred, and he should update in favor of it being possible.
It was just a continuity error. Thank you for the correction. I have removed the reference to King Arthur.
Cairo is a problem too, then (it was founded after Arthur lived).