thanks for the conversation, I’m bowing out here. I’ll read further comments, but (probably) not respond. I suspect we have a crux somewhere around identification of actors, and mechanisms of bridging causal responsibility for acausal (imagined) events, but I think there’s an inferential gap where you and I have divergent enough priors and models that we won’t be able to agree on them.
Then I have to thank you but say that this conversation has done absolutely nothing to help me understand why I might be wrong, which of course I hope I am. This comment is really directed at all the people who disagree-voted me, in the hope that they might explain why.
thanks for the conversation, I’m bowing out here. I’ll read further comments, but (probably) not respond. I suspect we have a crux somewhere around identification of actors, and mechanisms of bridging causal responsibility for acausal (imagined) events, but I think there’s an inferential gap where you and I have divergent enough priors and models that we won’t be able to agree on them.
Then I have to thank you but say that this conversation has done absolutely nothing to help me understand why I might be wrong, which of course I hope I am. This comment is really directed at all the people who disagree-voted me, in the hope that they might explain why.