It is possible that some of a group doesn’t believe the logical consequences of its own positions. That doesn’t make them immune from criticism based on those logical consequences.
The actual position of GiveWell on it’s charity recommendations are quite long documents. The problem comes when you reduces the complex position to a simplified position.
Deworming saves lives but at the same time it’s also better at getting children to attend school than a lot of other interventions. The fact that the argument for Deworming is commonly made via saved lives in no way implies that the other benefits don’t factor in.
It is possible that some of a group doesn’t believe the logical consequences of its own positions. That doesn’t make them immune from criticism based on those logical consequences.
The actual position of GiveWell on it’s charity recommendations are quite long documents. The problem comes when you reduces the complex position to a simplified position.
Deworming saves lives but at the same time it’s also better at getting children to attend school than a lot of other interventions. The fact that the argument for Deworming is commonly made via saved lives in no way implies that the other benefits don’t factor in.