correlation really does imply causation
I think I know what you mean by this, but in case someone’s wondering or if I’m wrong: If A is correlated with B then there must be some sort of causal connection somewhere, e.g. A ← C → B, though I guess your C might be “the laws of physics”.
I think I know what you mean by this, but in case someone’s wondering or if I’m wrong: If A is correlated with B then there must be some sort of causal connection somewhere, e.g. A ← C → B, though I guess your C might be “the laws of physics”.