assign each player the amount of bargaining power inversely proportional to the range of their gains possible under Pareto-optimal outcomes
Can adding irrelevant alternatives change the “range of possible gains”?
If by “irrelevant” you mean “not strongly Pareto-optimal”, then no. Unless my brain is turning to mush, of course.
Can adding irrelevant alternatives change the “range of possible gains”?
If by “irrelevant” you mean “not strongly Pareto-optimal”, then no. Unless my brain is turning to mush, of course.