The formulation of the question didn’t quite make it clear that emotivism was just intended as an example for one possible non-cognitivist position. That’s what I objected to. As an example, it’s fine of course—it is, after all, the most well-known such position.
The formulation of the question didn’t quite make it clear that emotivism was just intended as an example for one possible non-cognitivist position. That’s what I objected to. As an example, it’s fine of course—it is, after all, the most well-known such position.