Even after adjusting for terminology, I can’t understand the point of your comment. Maybe you could flesh it out more formally in your own preferred terms?
For example, imagine we’re receiving a sequence of integers. Consider the statements A = “all are even”, B = “all are perfect squares”, C = A and B, D = A or B. In your formalism, which of these are “hypotheses”? Which are “events”? Which “have complexity”, and which don’t?
Even after adjusting for terminology, I can’t understand the point of your comment. Maybe you could flesh it out more formally in your own preferred terms?
For example, imagine we’re receiving a sequence of integers. Consider the statements A = “all are even”, B = “all are perfect squares”, C = A and B, D = A or B. In your formalism, which of these are “hypotheses”? Which are “events”? Which “have complexity”, and which don’t?